Collins named mogging its word of the year for 2026. Six AI startups are now valued above the listed company they compete with, including Sierra, Clay, Lovable and Mercor. Most have a fraction of that rival's staff.
1the act of outdoing or overshadowing someone, especially in looks ‘he got mogged by his little brother at the wedding’
2business, informal the act of overtaking an older rival in value ‘Lovable have mogged Wix in 2026’
mog verb · mogs, mogging, mogged · US /ˈmɑː.ɡɪŋ/
Origin: 2010s internet slang, from AMOG, ‘alpha male of the group’
CollinsCollins English Dictionary announced on 3 November that mogging is its word of the year. It defines mogging as outshining, outperforming or upstaging someone or something, and says use of the word rose 210% in 2026. Its word for 2025 was vibe coding: building an app by describing it to AI.
We compared six AI startups with the listed company a customer would most likely weigh them against, such as Lovable against Wix for building a website. A startup's valuation is the price investors paid in its latest funding round. A listed company's market cap is its share price times its shares, and it moves every trading day. One figure is a sale price: Proofpoint agreed to buy Varonis for $6.3B in October.
Latest private valuation against the rival's market cap in November 2026
Source: Dealroom.co
Mercor, which hires experts to train AI models and was last valued at $10B in 2025, is worth almost nine times Upwork. Sierra, which sells AI customer-service agents, is worth almost six times Five9, and Clay more than five times ZoomInfo.
Each chart joins the startup's valuation from one funding round to the next with a straight line, against the listed rival's market cap at the end of each month, from January 2025. Each point is a funding round or the rival's lowest month; hover or tap one for the details.
Lovable's valuation at each round, joined by lines, against Wix's month-end market cap
Source: Dealroom.co
Modal's valuation at each round, joined by lines, against DigitalOcean's month-end market cap
Source: Dealroom.co
Clay's valuation at each round, joined by lines, against ZoomInfo's month-end market cap
Source: Dealroom.co · ZoomInfo market cap from Yahoo Finance and SEC filings
Employees
Source: Dealroom.co · Upwork annual report
Investors pay many times more per dollar of revenue for the startups, and the reason is growth. For four of the pairs, both sides have revenue figures we could check against company reporting a year apart: the startup's reported run-rate, and the listed rival's guidance for 2026 against its 2025 revenue.
Revenue growth against value ÷ revenue · startups: reported run-rate · rivals: 2026 guidance against 2025
Source: Dealroom.co · company reports
Five of the six startups were founded in 2021 or later, and every listed rival before 2015. A funding round prices a small stake bought by investors who expect fast growth, while a market cap prices the whole company at what public investors will pay today, so a startup's figure tends to run higher. Even so, in four of the six pairs the startup is worth more than four times the listed rival. The investors who set those prices expect the startups to win customers from the companies they are compared with here.
Startups are private companies tagged artificial intelligence on Dealroom with an announced valuation of $1B or more, set in 2025 or 2026. Each is paired with one listed company founded before 2015 that sells to the same customers for the same job. We also compared n8n with UiPath, Vast Data with Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) and EliseAI with AppFolio; in those three pairs the listed company is still worth more. We left out Cursor, whose closest rivals (GitHub Copilot, JetBrains) are not listed on their own, and Databricks, which is not AI-native and competes with Snowflake as a data platform of the same generation. Big Tech groups such as Microsoft, Alphabet and Adobe are left out, because a single product line inside them cannot be valued.
Market caps are as held on Dealroom in November 2026; Wix, DigitalOcean and Upwork were checked against Nasdaq on 2 November. Varonis's value is Proofpoint's agreed price (October 2026). Mercor was last valued in 2025. The growth chart divides revenue now by revenue a year earlier: for the startups, two company-reported run-rates (annualised down where they are more than 12 months apart); for the listed rivals, 2026 guidance against 2025 revenue. Value ÷ revenue uses the latest of those figures. All were checked against public reporting on 5 November 2026. Mercor is left out because its figure is gross revenue, and Cyera because the company disputes the reported one. Headcounts are from Dealroom company profiles; Upwork's headcount is from its annual report (about 630 at the end of 2025), because its Dealroom count includes freelancers; Mercor's has no company figure, so we use about 400 full-time staff, the most cited of outside estimates that run from about 200 to 500. Bars are scaled within each pair, so the larger company fills the row.